The Truth is Out There

Masking as a Duty to the Cult of Covid

February 6, 2021 ~ By Levana Lomma

“Recognizing that the right to differ is the centerpiece of our First Amendment freedoms, a government cannot mandate by fiat a feeling of unity in its citizens. Therefore, that very same government cannot carve out a symbol of unity and prescribe a set of approved messages to be associated with that symbol when it cannot mandate the status or feeling the symbol purports to represent.”

West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 (1943) 

The following article is derived from my Memorandum in Opposition to the Defendants Motion to Dismiss on my Federal case Lomma v. Connors et al. CASE NO.  CV 20-00456-JAO-RT

Learn more at http://www.forourrights.org

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease has been quoted on two occasions affirming these facts:

  1. Widespread mask usage by a healthy population has no significant affect on the prevalence of Covid-19 infections, and
  2. Wearing a mask has become much more akin to a cult-like symbolic representation of duty than a legitimate medical intervention backed by science.

For these two reasons there is absolutely no question that forced mask wearing is a blatant First Amendment violation and that such a highly protected fundamental right such as this can only be allowed if it passes strict scrutiny… which it does not.

On March 8, 2020 Dr. Fauci told Dr. Jon LaPook on an episode of 60 Minutes: 

“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. While masks may block some droplets, they do not provide the level of protection people think they do. Wearing a mask may also have unintended consequences: People who wear masks tend to touch their face more often to adjust them, which can spread germs from their hands.”

Then on May 27, 2020 Dr. Fauci told CNN he wears a face mask:

“because I want to make it be a symbol for people to see that that’s the kind of thing you should be doing.”

On July 13, 2020 CNN also reported

A face mask is more than a piece of cloth. It’s a sign of respect.

“Wearing a mask, ladies and gentlemen, is respect,” Dr. Padmini Murthy, professor and global health director at New York Medical College, said during a United Nations panel.

In a March 12, 2020 article in Time.com Ria Sinha, a senior research fellow at the University of Hong Kong’s Center for the Humanities and Medicine, tells TIME:

Wearing a mask, she explains, has become a “symbol and a tool of protection and solidarity”—even if research proving their efficacy is lacking. “Mask wearing is not always a medical decision for many people, but bound up in sociocultural practice,” she adds.

Dr. Mark Smolinski, an infectious disease physician explains why wearing a mask acts as a symbol of respect for others in a Forbes article dated June 25, 2020, where he says:

“You wear a mask to protect others, and others wear a mask to protect you. Wearing a mask is a true sign of respect for others; it is not an impingement on one’s freedom as many have claimed. Wearing a mask tells the person you pass on the street, share an aisle with in the supermarket, or march alongside at a peaceful protest, that you respect them as a fellow human.”

A medical doctor from America’s Frontline Doctors explains in a press conference: 

“We know these regular masks don’t work against viruses… That’s simply what it is… All viruses can get through… The reason we wear a mask… is because the fear is so massive in this country. I wear a mask so people don’t think I don’t care about them.”

It has become increasingly clear over the last 11 months that the ritual of mask wearing has become a form of symbolic expression intended to portray a “particularized message” ( see Nunez v. Davis, 169 F. 3d 1222 – Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1999) and that the regulation imposed through these ridiculous mandates is an attempt by Governments to mandate “a feeling of unity in its citizens”.

By refusing to take part in this act of symbolism intended to portray a message of compliance disguised as “respect for others” those who see through the façade and refuse to comply with the demands of the cult are then subjected to restrictions on free movement by being denied entry into most public spaces. Freedom of movement is the most fundamental aspect of the “right to be let alone” – which is the cornerstone of a free society.

When out in public it is not uncommon to refrain from speaking to others because of the inability to comprehend what they are saying due to being denied the ability to read their lips or clearly hear the words spoken. Face masks act like a muzzle making speech unintelligible and inaudible resulting in the suppression of typical human interaction. The right to freedom of speech includes not only the right to use your voice or to put words in print, but also the right to distribute, the right to receive, and the right to read and “reading” can be assumed to include reading expressions and reading lips. In fact, for the hearing impaired this is the only way for them to receive words spoken by others. 

“As a general rule, laws that by their terms distinguish favored speech from disfavored speech on the basis of the ideas or views expressed are content based.” Turner Broad. Sys. v. F.C.C., 512 U.S. 622, 643, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 2459, 129 L.Ed.2d 497 (1994). In as much as a mandatory mask requirement acts to serve as a symbol of compliance to the rules of the Cult of Covid, so too does it then act as a law to prohibit disfavored speech in the sense that not wearing a mask would then signify your disagreement with government overreach.

A cult is a social group that is defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or by its common interest in a particular personality, object, or goal. Absent any scientifically proven data that mask wearing by healthy individuals serves the intended goal, those within authoritative positions are not acting in a manner aligned with true science but rather in accordance with the Cult of Covid, in which its members maintain an unusual, irrational obsession with the idea that they can eradicate a virus by covering their face.

A cult is a social group that is defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs, or by its common interest in a particular personality, object, or goal.

Wikipedia

The belief that wearing an unsanitized, reused piece of cloth over one’s mouth just to enter a restaurant and walk to the table where they can then remove it for as long as they dine is completely devoid of logic and certainly cannot be considered scientifically nor medically sound, let alone sane. The rules around wearing a mask are so incredibly arbitrary and capricious that any critically thinking individual can plainly see that mandating their use is much more akin to a cult ritual than to serve a significant medical purpose. If the latter were the case only more effective N-95 type masks would be appropriate, not a bandana that sits on the dashboard and hasn’t been washed in months.

Because the supposed goal of a statewide mask requirement is to decrease or stop the spread of “Covid-19”, which we can see it has failed to do, and is in fact responsible for an increase in illness, it cannot be said to have a reasonable relation to the state interest, let alone pass a strict scrutiny standard of review which is the standard set forth when fundamental rights are being violated.

A regulation that is contributing to the problem it was created to solve can hardly be called narrowly tailored, especially when the regulation also presents many other harms both physically and emotionally. To ignore the negative impacts associated with a regulation intended to “protect public health and safety” is counter intuitive and downright irresponsible.

School children are being subjected to hours of oxygen deprivation which can lead to brain damage, “essential workers” are suffering through 40 hours a week of headaches, dizziness, increased heart rate and other detrimental side effects that can lead to accidents at work. Those who have legitimate physical or psychological limitations which make mask wearing impossible are being abused by their neighbors. There is absolutely no question that ongoing mask mandates are causing great harm to the population and yet there seems to be absolutely no risk vs. benefit analysis. 

None of these government officials violating the people’s fundamental rights have produced any empirical, scientifically nor medically proven evidence that 1) a state of “emergency” exists beyond the television; 2) that the face mask requirement is a scientifically proven and medically sound mechanism for achieving the intended goal; and 3) that all risks involved in mandating a medical intervention without prior medical evaluation has been weighed against the benefits.

Mask mandates are perhaps the most egregious rule being imposed worldwide and it is absolutely time to put an end to this insanity. Just say no to the Cult of Covid and take a stand for freedom.

The “War on Domestic Terrorism” Is a War on Freedom

In the wake of the most blatantly obvious stolen election of them all, the pieces of the puzzle are fitting together more with each passing day and it is clear to see that much of what we have endured this past year through the use of Covid related propaganda has been aimed at achieving specific political goals.

Is anyone really surprised that the same day Biden is inaugurated the World Health Organization also releases updated guidance for the use of the PCR test? The new guidance of course will eliminate a good portion of false positives and we can then begin the decline in cases, which of course will be attributed to the vaccine and Biden’s amazing leadership.

On January 6, 2021 Antifa provocateurs were used to infiltrate the demonstration in D.C. to create insurrection theatrics that could then be tied to Trump supporters in order to justify a preplanned solution to this problem of dissent against government overreach. It’s a classic Hegelian Dialectic scenario and it is the Modus Operandi of the New World Order agents seeking to expedite the efforts to create a centralized one world government built on Communistic principles by the year 2030.

The overarching power structure behind this agenda is the United Nations and a large part of the efforts for world wide control of all governments is rooted in the International Health Regulations created in 2005 by the World Health Organization. The WHO has been intricately intertwined with the UN for decades, using these regulations to coerce nations into compliance with policies that are sure to dissolve nationalism and reward commitment to the agenda…all under the guise of protecting public health.

Now that the elite overlords have placed their chosen puppet as our “leader” in America the efforts to remove all the rights and freedoms cherished in this country is now in high gear. The plan is to remove all private property, all rights to privacy and free movement, to destroy capitalism and the free market, to destroy our right to private money transactions and ultimately remove all autonomy and individualism.

The Great Reset will be the end of humanity as we know it as we descend into a dark “New Normal” where Artificial Intelligence will govern every aspect of life until the HUMAN is no longer needed. It is all about maximizing profit and reducing liabilities. There are far too many of us humans, producing all this carbon and eating up all the crops. Those who manage this human farm from the shadows would love to be rid of a great portion of the population and they will succeed as long as the masses remain oblivious of the Medical Mafia intent to poison us with pharmaceuticals and “vaccines.”

Now we face the next scene of this horror flick: The “War on Domestic Terror.” Just like the original War on Terror which was ushered in as a means of protection — from big bad Muslim airplane hijacking, box-cutter wielding maniacs who operated commercial jetliners with more precision than 30 year veterans with no training — but instead acted as a way to strip Americans of their rights, so too will this new war against We The People. The idea here is: you either submit to the agenda and control your urge to speak out against injustice and the government propaganda or you become an enemy of the state!

Knowing that there are countless facilities around the country that are ready to be used to house those who are “displaced” for one reason or another, it is very disturbing to think that anyone who dare garner themselves a label such as “conservative”, “right-wing”, “conspiracy theorist”, “Trump Supporter”, “Republican”, or “ant-vaxxer” just might earn themselves a bed in one of these camps is something none of us wants to even imagine. But it’s not outside the realm of possibility.

We truly are at war and if we do not stand up against this agenda and take back the Republic, there will soon be no more opportunity to do so! We must understand that WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT! Right now there is a quasi government in place, known as the Corporation of the United States of America which was put in place in 1871 with the creation of the District of Columbia and is controlled by the British Crown. They have taken over and destroyed all that this country was founded upon. The Constitution will not be enforced as the Supreme Law of the Land until the people reclaim it as such!

But, how do we do that?

We start by educating ourselves and others. We cannot solve a problem when we don’t even know it exists! Get out into your community and talk to people. Talk to people who work in government. Demand that those who have been elected to represent us stand up for what is right. Choose freedom and integrity over a paycheck! Refuse to follow orders. Refuse to comply. Write letters. Make phone calls. File lawsuits. PROTEST! It is a daunting task that seems impossible but we will never get there by hoping things will change. If nothing changes, nothing changes! It’s up to you to take action!

It’s Time To Start Asking Some Questions

This is not a virus – it is a CARTOON

January 13, 2021 ~ By Levana Lomma with contributions from Makia Freeman

Q: If the recovery rate of all those who test positive for Covid is 99.95%, why is there even a need for a vaccine in the first place? 

Vaccines usually take 7-20 years to adequately research, test and bring to market. The slew of COVID vaccines produced by Big Pharma companies like Pfizer and Moderna are being rushed to market in less than 12 months, which is nowhere enough time to meet established safety standards. No long-term safety studies were conducted, so no one has any real idea of the danger these vaccines could cause down the line. Many of the trials only lasted 3-4 months. Animal trials, an important part of safety testing, were skipped entirely.

Q: Why would a perfectly healthy person with a robust immune system want to make themselves sick with a toxic vaccine?

The COVID vaccines promote disease enhancement due to pathogenic priming. In other words, they make people sicker than the disease would have. In Moderna’s trials alone, 21% of people had significant adverse effects. Since the rollout of the COVID vax, doctors and nurses have experienced extreme fluctuations in blood pressure leading to fainting, been blinded, contracted Bell’s palsy and become paralyzed. Many people have even died following the vaccine, including in places like Miami, Portugal and Iceland.

Q: Why would anyone trust a vaccine technology that has never been used on humans before?

The COVID vaccines produced by Pfizer and Modern are called mRNA vaccines – a completely new type of vaccine that has never been licensed or used on humans before. We have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine and no way to know if it will be effective or safe. Traditional vaccines introduce pieces of a weakened virus to stimulate an immune response. mRNA vaccines inject molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-human sources into your cells, thus hijacking your genes and permanently reprogramming them to produce antibodies to kill the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID. These newly created proteins are not regulated by your DNA and are thus completely foreign to your body.

Q: If the Covid-19 vaccine is not proven to be safe nor effective while also carrying a high risk of injury why would I want to have it?

With the risks of the COVID vaccine so undeniably grave, you might think the benefits are large. Think again. Big Pharma has stated that the vaccine only protects against mild (not moderate or severe) symptoms, which makes the vaccine virtually pointless, given the large majority of people who allegedly have COVID have little or no symptoms whatsoever.

Q: If the Covid Vaccine doesn’t stop transmission why are we told we can’t go back to normal until everyone is vaccinated?

Surprisingly, Big Pharma has also admitted they didn’t design the vaccine to stop transmission.

If that’s the case what did they design it for???

If someone else gets the vaccine, it doesn’t stop them from transmitting the virus to you, and if you get the vaccine, it does not stop you from transmitting the virus to others. Therefore, the vaccine plays absolutely no role in herd immunity.

The World Health Organization admitted that there is no “evidence on any of the [COVID] vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”

Q: If SARS-CoV-2 has never been properly isolated in a lab, how can one make a vaccine for it?

The vaccine cannot possibly be truly effective since it was not based on an actual isolated sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The WHO protocols that Pfizer used to produce the mRNA do not appear to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When questioned about this, Pfizer confirmed: “The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.”

Q: How can this be called a vaccine if it doesn’t stop transmission or create immunity?

According to Dr. David Martin who spoke during the Focus on Fauci live webinar produced by New Earth Media:

“Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine.

Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say “what other treatments are there?”

The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site. And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue.

The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.

So we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health.

Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick… 80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.

When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media – it has been paid for – if you follow the money you realize there is no non-conflicted voice on any network.”

Q: Just what are these psychopaths really trying to do to humanity?

Moderna, who has also been a leader in the development of a Covid-19 vaccine and has ties to the MIT project that involves implanting nanotechnology under the skin to provide a scannable immunity record has actually published on their website that this is true: the mRNA vaccine injects an “operating system” into your body that they call “The Software of Life.” 

Q: If the vaccine manufacturers are not liable for the injuries and possible death, how can governments demand we take it?

Under the PREP Act of 2005, the COVID-19 vaccine will have near blanket immunity. That means if anyone is injured or killed, no one besides you and your family will bear responsibility — not the vaccine manufacturer, not the doctor administering the vaccine, nor the government body or employer who decided to mandate the vaccine. That is exceptionally alarming given the fact there are major safety concerns with the COVID-19 vaccine. Very simply, vaccine manufacturers cannot ensure the long-term safety of any COVID vaccine since the products have had months of clinical experience at best.

Are you willing to be a guinea pig for Big Pharma over a virus that most people easily recover from?

Thanks for subscribing!

The Engineering of ‘Pandemics’

Vaccine-Induced Disease Epidemic Outbreaks

By A. True Ott, PhD, ND

 August 23, 2009

Video and Commentary by Levana Lomma ~ January 3, 2021

The year was 1921. America was entering a decade of robust prosperity. Later called “The Roaring Twenties”, it was a time of unparalleled economic expansion. Debt money from Wall Street banks was plentiful and easy to obtain. The “Great War” was over.

America was flexing her industrial muscles. Factories were being built and expanded in every major city. Automobiles began rolling off Detroit assembly lines in record numbers. The stock market began making millionaires. People were HEALTHY and HAPPY ­ largely because the dreaded “world mystery disease” (which decades later became known as the “1918 Flu Pandemic”) had disappeared. Two entire years had passed with no dreaded “mystery deaths” being reported. America had cause to celebrate, and celebrate they did!

As a matter of fact, the American Public in general was so optimistic and HAPPY in 1921, that relatively few people were unhealthy as well. For the first time in decades, hospital beds were empty. The fledgling American Medical Association, formed by John D. Rockefeller just a few years earlier, was worried. Business was sagging.

Profits from vaccines and drugs were spiraling. Something had to be done, and done immediately. False, faux epidemics of smallpox were created to solve the problem, and keep the Medical Mafia’s cash registers ringing.

We know this dastardly plan actually happened, thanks to a citizen’s WATCHDOG GROUP in Kansas City, Missouri named “The Advertiser’s Protective Bureau”, who filed, and successfully prosecuted criminal charges against the Missouri state chapter of the AMA ­ the Jackson Medical Society. The ‘Protective Bureau’s” official report of this cold-blooded plot reads as follows:

“In the Fall of 1921, the health of the city was unusually good, but slow for the doctors. So the Jackson Medical Society met and resolved to make an epidemic in the city. According to the minutes of this meeting: ‘MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED, THAT A RECOMMENDATION BE MADE BY THE COMMITTEE, TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH, THAT AN EPIDEMIC OF SMALLPOX BE DECLARED IN THE CITY.

(Investigation later revealed that there was NO SIGN OF AN EPIDEMIC at the time, in the city, or anywhere in the state or region!)

‘It was moved and seconded that a day be set aside, termed VACCINATION DAY, on which physicians would be stationed at ALL SCHOOLS, clinics, public buildings and hospitals to vaccinate “free of charge”.’

(Vaccinations are never “free”. The taxpayers are always forced to pay for every one of the “free” vaccines.)

“IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT WIDE PUBLICITY BE GIVEN, STATING THAT VACCINATION IS A PREVENTIVE OF SMALLPOX, AND URGING THE ABSOLUTE NECESSITY OF VACCINATION FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD IN THE CITY.”

The Protective Bureau proved in court that there WAS NO EPIDEMIC before the vaccinations!! The court records show that the Medical Society manufactured vast amounts of posters, fliers, newspaper stories and ads featuring horrific and lurid pictures of diseased children covered with massive smallpox sores and open wounds. Some pictures actually showed children’s corpses covered with the same ugly sores. The PANIC-DRIVEN message was clear — VACCINATE EVERYONE, or face a deadly public disease. There was a “sweeping epidemic” in the city; the disease was “highly contagious” and would “strike anyone who was not vaccinated” was the bill of goods sold! (Does this sound at all familiar today ­ 88 years later??)

The Medical Mafia’s propaganda blitz was successful, and over a million previously healthy and happy American citizens were hypnotized and terrorized into placing the vaccine toxins into their bloodstreams. All public school children in the region were vaccinated while at school! Parents who dared question the vaccination of their children were ostracized and publicly vilified.

Audio version with my commentary

THE COURT RECORD ON THIS CASE IS VERY CLEAR.

In the weeks and months following the “mass vaccinations” the area’s hospital beds were filled to over-flowing with VACCINE-INDUCED SMALLPOX CASES!

Tens of thousands of people became ill, and many hundreds of innocents died, and many more were permanently crippled! Of course, THE NEWSPAPERS THEN TRUMPETED HOW WISE THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT WAS TO PROMOTE THE VACCINES ­ stating how much worse the death toll would have been without the vaccination campaign!! Untold MILLIONS OF DOLLARS of profit was generated by this massive “medical” fraud.

Thanks to the ADVERTISER’S PROTECTIVE BUREAU, however; the massive fraud was exposed and criminally prosecuted to a successful conviction. During the trial, three amazing facts were proven beyond any “reasonable doubt”.

Fact 1: The poster and advertising pictures showing the diseased and dying children used so successfully by the “doctors”, WERE NOT EVEN CASES OF LOCAL SMALLPOX CASES AS THEY WERE BILLED TO BE! The Protective Bureau documented that they were pictures of ENGLISH CHILDREN who were victims of “court-proven” cases of SMALLPOX VACCINE POISONING!!

One of the pictures was of a 5-week-old baby named Mona Stevenson, of Humphrey Street, Burnley, England. A previously healthy and happy baby, Little Mona had been vaccinated for smallpox at 5 weeks of age. Four weeks later, her pox-ridden little body was placed in a tiny coffin and buried. The horrific photos of Little Mona and others in England had previously been published in British newspapers where details of the resulting CRIMINAL TRIALS were also given. The full details of the trials, as well as the pictures, were also included in a comprehensively large medical boot titled “THE HISTORY AND PATHOLOGY OF VACCINATION” by Edgar M Crookshank, MD ­ professor of Bacteriology at the ultra-elite Kings College, London England.

Fact 2: Vaccines containing LIVE VIRUSES, weakened (i.e. attenuated) or otherwise universally causes more diseases than the vaccine ever could prevent.

Fact 3: Vaccine-Induced-Disease (VID) is an extremely effective socio-economic tool. It has the potential to generate BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF WINDFALL PROFITS, while permanently changing the social structures of large groups of people.

While the Protective Bureau won the criminal court case ­ the American People lost. The case should have made front-page headlines around the nation, showing the Modus Operandi of certain corrupt “medical practitioners”. How, by means of fraud, treachery, and trickery, they made millions of dollars in windfall profits while thousands of innocent, trusting, and naïve Americans suffered and died. The entire sordid affair, with all its damning details, was kept out of the American Press. John D. Rockefeller’s AMA, with its millions of dollars of influence ­ made sure of that!

Amazingly, even though thousands of people had died or become crippled by this managed manslaughter, the doctors involved were only given a light penalty in the form of a token fine. The medical establishment as a whole was not upset in the least by the exposure ­ and has continued on unabated perpetuating the same crimes against humanity ­ creating vaccine-induced-diseases while fleecing the people continually until this present day.

It is a proven (albeit little-known) fact, EPIDEMIC/PANDEMIC MANUFACTURING IS STANDARD PRACTICE with the world-wide “Medical Mafia” circles. In order to maximize profits and re-shape geographical regions, they often manufacture a false-flag “emergency”. If there is an outbreak of mild seasonal virus, they call it an influenza pandemic, give it a fancy new name, and then actually CREATE THE PANDEMIC by means of mass vaccinations using ATTENUATED, or LIVE VIRUSES!!

Remember the shocking words of the AMA’s Dr. Simon Louis Katzoff who said: ” DOCTORS LIVE BY DISEASE, SO THE PUBLIC CAN EXPECT THE SUPPLY OF DISEASE TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION.”

OTHER DOCUMENTED CASES OF V.I.D.E.O.s (Vaccine Induced Disease Epidemic Outbreaks.)

Case 1: Following the lead of their colleagues in Kansas City, the exact same events occurred in Pittsburgh, PA under the direction of Pittsburgh’s “Health Director”, Dr. C.J. Voux in the autumn of 1924. As in Kansas City, a group of public watchdogs brought suit against Voux and his vaccine-promoters. As in Kansas City, the vaccine promoters were found guilty. The case documented that over 1,000,000 vaccine shots were “sold” to the residents of Pennsylvania, even though there had been ZERO documented cases of smallpox in the region. It was successfully proven that ONLY AFTER the million shots had been given, that a smallpox epidemic began.

This vaccine-induced, manmade “epidemic” resulted in 330 deaths and at least 1,680 cases of severe smallpox that caused permanent, crippling damage to the survivors. Moreover, it cost the city a total monetary loss of $3,069,616; although Dr. Voux and his accomplices had collected more than $10 million in hospital and related care revenues ­ they were not forced to pay for damages or reparations. As in the Kansas City trial, a small, insignificant fine was levied, and the case was not widely publicized.

Case 2: The initial batches of Dr. Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine produced thousands of cases of poliomyelitis in vaccinated individuals. (One such case was Franklin D. Roosevelt ­ who was stricken weeks after receiving a vaccine.) This was due to an unsafe amount of LIVE VIRUSES in the vaccine itself. Dr. Sabin then introduced his “improved” vaccine with “attenuated” or “weakened’ live viruses in 1958, and the following year his vaccine was made to be compulsory (mandatory) in all school-age children in a number of states.

As a result, polio increased a whopping 300% in these states. For example, Tennessee reported 119 polio cases in 1958, after “vaccination” this total increased to 386 cases in 1959, Ohio ­ 17 cases in 1958, 52 cases in 1959, Connecticut ­ 45 cases in 1958, 123 cases in 1959, and North Carolina: 78 cases in 1958 compared to 312 cases in 1959 AFTER forcing compulsory shots in school children. The modern record is equally damning. The ONLY cases of recorded polio in the modern era is immediately following vaccinations.

Poliomyelitis, you see, is a water-borne virus and is caused by drinking contaminated water.

During the early 60’s, water-treatment facilities became standardized across America ­ small amounts of CHLORINATION effectively wiped out polio viruses. The conquering of polio had NOTHING TO DO with the vaccine needles and swallowing sugar cubes.

In fact, as author Ed Haslem documents so well in his book, Dr. Mary’s Monkey, the Sabin vaccines were actually contaminated with mutated GREEN MONKEY VIRUSES (SV-40 viruses to be specific) which has caused untold millions of SOFT-TISSUE CANCERS and deaths worldwide. (The cancer “industry” has reaped BILLIONS of dollars from this “contamination” over the years, of course.) Dr. Maurice Hilleman has actually confessed as being a part of this very activity.

Case 3: Knowingly added to “hepatitis” vaccines, HIV viruses were inoculated into thousands of homosexual men and intravenous drug users in America’s inner cities resulting in the “AIDS epidemic” in the 80’s. Purposefully placed in SMALLPOX VACCINE SYRINGES, HIV was also introduced into African nations as a tool of ethnic cleansing and GENOCIDE. The covert development and weaponization of the HIV/AIDS virus and its monkey-virus origins, along with the amazing story of how the scientists involved are tied to President Kennedy’s assassination is well documented in Dr. Mary’s Monkey. The covert biological experimentation labs responsible for this mayhem are today consolidated into the NIH, the NAIDS, the National Cancer Institute, and Ft. Detrick, Maryland. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta became the centralized hub of pandemic and epidemic creations and propagation.

Case 4: The 1976 “Swine Flu” Fiasco and Fraud is perpetrated. A solitary soldier at Ft. Dix collapses and dies following a reaction to an “experimental” vaccine while completing an intense physical “forced march” exercise at Ft. Dix. Immediately, the CDC swings into action, declaring a nationwide SWINE FLU PANDEMIC is pending. Providentially, of course, the CDC just happens to have 200+MILLION DOSES of Swine Flu vaccine already stockpiled, prepared with ATTENUATED (live, yet weakened) viruses and experimental ADJUVANTS.

President Gerald Ford, (with proven ties to Big Pharma and Nixon’s covert viral weapons labs ­ also a key member of the “Warren Commission’s” obfuscation of the JFK murder) rolls up his sleeves on national TV and dutifully takes the vaccine. 40 million vaccines are given to naïve American human guinea pigs. A rash of auto-immune disorders (Guillan-Barre Syndrome GBS, and lupus) as well as a large number of deaths is immediately attributed to the vaccine, and the mass vaccination campaign is halted. (What happened to the other 140 million vaccines, one may ask?) In 1979, the television news magazine 60 Minutes did a documentary investigation on this travesty-for-money scandal. Against all odds and the threats of Big Pharma, the OBJECTIVELY FAIR 60 Minutes program aired ONE TIME. There was no follow-up story, No criminal indictments were ever issued. There was no MASS- MURDER-FOR-HIRE trial. As a result, America has largely forgotten the 1976 SWINE FLU SCANDAL!

Case 5: During the first Gulf War ­ Operation Desert Storm, an experimental anthrax vaccine was forcibly given to 140,000 rear-echelon support troops. This experimental vaccine included an oil-in-water adjuvant called squalene (aka MF-59 made by NOVARTIS). Despite voluminous studies showing dangerous toxicity factors conducted on “oil-in-water” adjuvants at such prestigious research labs as UCLA ­ the U.S. Military brass consented to the experimental injections. As a result, ALL 140,000 troops developed a condition subsequently named “Gulf War Syndrome”. This sordid tale is explained in a very honest and credible book by Gary Matsumoto, called, Vaccine-A.

ALL MODERN “PANDEMICS” ARE CAUSED BY VACCINE NEEDLES

As this author has repeatedly declared during many public radio interviews, the deadly 1918 Influenza Pandemic was the direct result of live-virus-contaminated Typhus Fever Vaccines mandatorily given to U.S. and Allied military personnel during World War I. During that era, viruses were not yet discovered and diseases were thought to be bacterial only. These deadly typhus fever vaccines were manufactured by John D. Rockefeller’s research labs and Chinese pharma factories. The vaccine “seed stock” consisted of viruses harvested from human typhoid fever patients, cross-injected into swine herds to create increased “seed stock”, and then injected into chicken and turkey eggs for further incubation of the pathogens. The final, harvested “vaccine material” then was injected into HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF HUMAN VEINS. The result was a massive ‘pandemic’ that claimed the lives of as many as 50 million people worldwide.

In 1918, the viral pandemic was an honest mistake ­ the result of a combination of a very bad vaccine and gross ignorance about viruses and the diseases they cause. However, the continued denial of these FACTS, and the subsequent REVERSE ENGINEERING OF THE KILLER VIRUS in Ft. Detrick labs (1997-2003) is inexcusable and constitutes a veritable crime against humanity.

Moreover, the ONLY WAY a modern “SWINE FLU PANDEMIC” can actually materialize is by injection of certain LIVE VIRUSES via vaccine needles. Make no mistake, the world is NOT experiencing a true pandemic explosion at this time ­ but it most assuredly WILL when and if the planned mass influenza vaccinations are completed worldwide.

THE DANGERS INHERENT IN “DUPLEX” VACCINES FROM DESIGNER VIRUSES

“Modern Medical Practitioners”, including some well-meaning “osteopaths”, would have the world believe the MYTH that vaccines containing attenuated (weakened) live viruses cannot cause the viral disease conditions they are targeting. This is a most dangerous misconception for the following SCIENTIFIC reasons.

Traditional “common” vaccines targeting measles, mumps and rubella for instance, contain small amounts of “attenuated” live viruses which have been “weakened” but not 100% killed outright. Research has shown that these weakened “live” viruses create a very mild form of the disease in the human that has been vaccinated, which in turn creates a cellular immunity from that pathogen. The science behind this is correct, and valid for the most part. To keep the targeted viral pathogen in a perpetually weakened state, specific amounts of formaldehyde and ether are typically added, and in some formulations, mercury in the form of thimerasol is added as a preservative to keep the egg albumin cells from decaying and dying prematurely. The established theory behind all of this ‘vaccination’ is the “protect the herd” theory which originated with Pasteur in the late 19th century. As in all vaccines, a certain small percentage of the herd will develop severe, ‘full blown’ disease states CAUSED by the attenuated viruses in the vaccine itself, and another percentage will exhibit side effects from the chemicals added to the vaccine ­ but if the vast majority of the herd is “protected” from the disease condition ­ the vaccine is approved and stamped “safe and effective”.

Science has also proven that each viral pathogen has its own unique characteristics that produce its own set of symptoms in the human hosts. Thus, each viral pathogen has its own unique fingerprints of replication and reproduction as well. Each virus also has a different level of effectiveness in its attenuated (weakened) state.

Moreover, some viruses have shown the ability to “drift” and acquire additional genetic alterations over time. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE OF THE SO-CALLED “NOVEL” RECOMBINATION VIRUSES that have been “reverse engineered” in the world’s weapons laboratories!

When the RNA of the virus is spliced with other viral genes, the resulting “Franken-virus” is very unpredictable. Studies conducted (yet currently unpublished) by Terrence Tumpey, Jeffrey Taubenberger, and others at the NIH and CDC show that these ‘resurrected pandemic viruses’ do not exhibit the NORMAL tendencies of traditional, NATURAL influenza viruses such as seasonal H3N2 human strains. They are best described as “Viral Wild Cards”.

This is just one problem with the headlong, mad rush to vaccinate Americans with a series of reverse-engineered lab-created viruses, attenuated or otherwise, in an UNTESTED, UNTRIED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE that has not been subjected to LONG-TERM CLINICAL TRIALS TO DETERMINE THE LEVELS OF “DRIFT” or even ATTENUATED TENDENCIES OVER TIME.

To supposedly minimize this “safety” issue, the CDC is now recommending a DUPLEX vaccination, of all things. A “duplex” vaccination basically involves a two-shot series. The first shot consists of a VERY WEAK, HIGHLY ATTENUTATED dose of the live virus.

This is intended to create an initial immune response patterning the specific virus injected. Within a couple of weeks of the 1st shot, a BOOSTER SHOT is given. The booster shot has only lightly attenuated, or even FULL STRENGTH VIRUSES in the injection. This 2nd shot is then intended to create a full-strength immune system response in the human subject.

This is, at the very least, BAD SCIENCE and borders on insanity for self-evident and fairly obvious reasons. By their own admissions, the NIH scientists in their various writings have declared that the level of potency of these REVERSE ENGINEERED VIRUSES show abnormal, almost RANDOM tendencies in their attenuated states. Nobody really knows what will happen over time as the inevitable “genetic drifts” occur. It is a literal crap shoot. It is highly probable that even the HIGHLY ATTENUATED FRANKEN-VIRUSES can swiftly regain their FULL POTENCY even in the presence of ether and formaldehyde. (See Addendum Below) Secondly, the full-strength BOOSTER shot viruses could just as easily “DRIFT” into something much more deadly than the “original’ recombinant virus that it is targeting.

I submit that the scientists responsible for this “pandemic” are not stupid. They have to know these facts as well as I do.

Therefore, I can only conclude that this entire affair is following the Modus Operandi of the medical elite since the 1920 engineered smallpox epidemics. It is all being ORCHESTRATED first and foremost for MONEY, and secondly, for social and geographical restructuring of the “human herd”.

Also, it must be understood that this “Novel 2009 Influenza” is not easily nor readily transmissible between humans. (See published study in the addendum). If this report is accurate, how then did the “Pandemic” begin, and why the need for mass vaccinations at all?? Like the “study” shows, the only way the test ferrets could contract or transmit the 2009 “Novel Swine Flu” was by and through INOCULATION OF THE DISEASE!! Humanity demands an answer, and demands it NOW!!!

A. True Ott, Phd, ND

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

George Santayana

Those who are ignorant of the past, cannot be expected to remember it. ~A. True Ott, Phd, ND

ADDENDUM ABSTRACTS FROM SELECTED FRANKEN-VIRUS STUDIES

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11226311? ordinalpos=70&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pub med_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Feb. 27, 2001

Sequence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus nonstructural gene (NS) segment and characterization of recombinant viruses bearing the 1918 NS genes.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Basler%20CF%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus<

Basler CF

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Reid%20AH%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Reid AH,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Dybing%20JK%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Dybing JK,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Janczewski%20TA%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Janczewski TA,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Fanning%20TG%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Fanning TG,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Zheng%20H%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Zheng H,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Salvatore%20M%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Salvatore M,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Perdue%20ML%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Perdue ML,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrezDb=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Swayne%20DE%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Swayne DE,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Garc%C3%ADaSastre%20A%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

García-Sastre A,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=% 22Palese%20P%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Palese P,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Taubenberger%20JK%22%5BAuthor% 5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_Discove ryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus

Tumpey TM.

Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Recent reports of mild to severe influenza-like illness in humans caused by a novel swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus underscore the need to better understand the pathogenesis and transmission of these viruses in mammals. In this study, selected 2009 A(H1N1) influenza isolates were assessed for their ability to cause disease in mice and ferrets and compared with a contemporary seasonal H1N1 virus for their ability to transmit to naïve ferrets through respiratory droplets. In contrast to seasonal influenza H1N1 virus, 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses caused increased morbidity, replicated to higher titers in lung tissue, and were recovered from the intestinal tract of intranasally inoculated ferrets. The 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses exhibited less efficient respiratory droplet transmission in ferrets in comparison with the highly transmissible phenotype of a seasonal H1N1 virus. Transmission of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses was further corroborated by characterizing the binding specificity of the viral hemagglutinin to the sialylated glycan receptors (in the human host) by use of dose-dependent direct receptor-binding and human lung tissue-binding assays.

Original article found on Rense.com

Meta Analysis of 54 Studies Shows Asymptomatic Spread is FALSE

December 29, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

The mass majority of the population appears to be in a hypnotic state. They have been told they must “stay home to save lives” and are much better off sitting in front of their television than to be out spreading disease. Doesn’t matter of course that they are healthy: enter the “asymptomatic carrier”.

Entire economies have been completely obliterated thanks to this unfounded, nonsensical, unscientific and unproven THEORY. Family members no longer hug each other and small talk in grocery lines has become a thing of the past. Even just a friendly smile is no longer safe, or even worth the effort since no one can see each other’s faces anyway.

And this is the New Normal.

A place where being human is far too dangerous thanks to the fear propaganda fueling the concept of asymptomatic spread.

Yet all of this fear that perfectly healthy people can be spreading disease has never once been proven true and our very own experts including Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, and Dr. Fauci himself have both said that asymptomatic spread is rare, and not the driver of an outbreak.

Now a new study published on December 14, 2020 in the Journals of The American Medical Association confirms what many of us have known from the very beginning: the idea of asymptomatic spread is FALSE. The use of this concept has largely been implemented as a method of control and an instrument for global economic destruction while keeping the masses easily manipulated through fear.

In this recent publication, meta analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants showed that the rate of asymptomatic and presymptomatic index cases was 0.7% (95% CI 0%-4.9%).

The asymptomatic/presymptomatic secondary attack rate is not statistically different from zero, and the confidence interval is technically 0.7 ± 4.2, resulting in a range of -3.5%-4.9%, but attack rates cannot be negative, so it is truncated at 0.

ZERO.

Just like the other studies we have seen which also found exactly ZERO incidence of secondary infection from asymptomatic individuals.

Back in May there was a study out of China that looked at 455 contacts who had been exposed to a patient in a hospital who tested positive but showed no symptoms. Not one of the 455 contacts tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

ZERO.

In November of 2020 another study done in Wuhan, China was published involving nearly 10 million participants. In this study NOT ONE positive test result came from the 1,174 contacts who were exposed to asymptomatic carriers.

ZERO.

https://rumble.com/vcawvz-asymptomatic-spread-is-proven-to-be-false.html

Please subscribe to my Bit Chute Channel as well! I don’t see myself being on You Tube much longer!

“We would really like to see the data, because if there is asymptomatic transmission, it really impacts the policies regarding screening, etc. But the one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaksThe driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci

Right from the horses mouth.

And yet the masking and the lockdowns and the quarantines continue. How much longer are we going to keep playing this game? When will the truth bear any weight on the decisions around policies? When will the politicians start representing the people instead of the stakeholders and lobbyists?

When will the hypnotized masses awaken to the grand deception and demand an end to this insanity? Only if they turn off their television…then we may stand a chance.

Finally: WHO Admits There is a Problem With The PCR Test

December 19, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Scientists have known for some time that there are serious flaws when it comes to using the RT-PCR test to detect a virus. Questions around it’s accuracy since as far back as the AIDS epidemic prove that those in the know have been in the know since before this Plandemic began.

In 2007 a New York Times article titled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t” detailed how a Whooping Cough “epidemic” turned out to be a “false alarm” due to faith in the “highly sensitive molecular test” being used to look for pertussis among healthcare workers that were falling ill. Further lab results revealed otherwise and Gina Kolata wrote, “it appears the health care workers probably were afflicted with ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.”

This is the same situation found today with the PCR test, which has been touted as the “Gold Standard” in which to detect SARS-CoV2, but simply cannot be considered reliable in determining the presence of any live virus because the process of amplification can result in any number of viral particles, dead or alive, producing a positive result not indicative of infection.

On December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally issued a notice revealing a “problem” with the RT-PCR test to be considered by health care workers. The notice reports:

WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.  

Leading to a call for healthcare workers to determine whether an adjustment in Cycle Threshold may be necessary:

to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.

This is exactly what has been said over and again by many experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci himself: A Ct value above 35 cycles can result in a positive test from an amplification of particles that have absolutely nothing to do with SARS-CoV2.

The notice goes on to say…

[W]hen specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain. Thus, the IFU will state how to interpret specimens at or near the limit for PCR positivity. In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise.

This goes right along with what the inventor of the test himself had said as well: that the PCR test was not designed for and should not be used for diagnosis. Yet here we are, basing every economic policy and all regulations around returning to a “normal” life on the number of “confirmed” cases.

It is nothing less than criminal to have known all along the serious flaws in the PCR test and continue to use it to make life and death decisions that will have a lasting effect on us all.

The real question is: what will we do with this admission by the World Health Organization? Will there be a significant change in the course of this insanity train? Or will we just ignore this FACT just like the 1.4% Infection Fatality Rate and the WHO guidance that mask wearing should be reserved for those who are sick?

WHO is really calling the shots?

Thanks for subscribing!

Fool Me Once…

No “Normalcy” on The Horizon Even With a Vaccine

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a news conference in the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020.
Chris Kleponis | Bloomberg | Getty Images

December 17, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Covid-19 continues to dominate the headlines and there seems to be no end in sight to the continued media frenzy over “confirmed cases”. What the media fails to report on as usual is the declining death rate and the the fact that total deaths for the year are not far off from the average.

But that’s to be expected, of course, if you are trying to maintain the heightened sense of threat needed to induce a fear driven consent to continued tyranny for the sake of “safety”.

By the summer of 2020 talking heads in governments worldwide were parroting the adage that things cannot go “back normal until we have a vaccine.”

Yet, here we are six months later, and as the Pfizer vaccine is making it’s way into healthcare settings for distribution in the U.S and elsewhere, we have people like Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health associate Amy Hobbs declaring that “wearing a mask will become part of my daily life, moving forward, even after a vaccine is deployed.”

Flip flopping on the story has been the common theme among the experts and now once again we have our favorite expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, Head of The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, going from warning us of the dangers in continued economic and social lockdown back in spring to letting us know (without any real explanation) that any chance of a return to normal is not expected until fall of 2021 at the earliest.

Another one of our favorite Fauci quotes was recorded during a 60 Minutes interview with Dr. Jon LaPook where he avowed that “people should not be walking around in masks”, and while many have assumed that the mask wearing would end once a vaccine hit the scenes, we now have our favorite double speaking health expert declaring:

“Obviously, with a 90-plus percent effective vaccine, you could feel much more confident” about not getting the virus, Fauci told Tapper. “But I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you have been vaccinated.” Those fundamentals include: universal wearing of masks, maintaining physical distance, avoiding large crowds, doing more outdoor activities and washing hands frequently.

Because “even though, for the general population, it might be 90[%] to 95% effective,” said Fauci, “you don’t necessarily know, for you, how effective it is.” Even at those success rates, about 5% to 10% of people immunized may still get the virus.

CNBC.com

Sadly, the majority of the unsuspecting public remains completely oblivious of the constant use of promises of TEMPORARY restrictions to elicit consent to a long term agenda. By the time they realize they’ve been fooled it’s already too late.

The methodical deconstruction of the current system is already well under way and most have found a certain comfort in their compliance as they quickly forget that it was supposed to be two weeks to flatten the curve.

It only takes about two months for a certain behavior to become habit, and the ruling class know this. They have spent many decades perfecting the manipulation of human psychology in order to get us to this place.

So, now here we are nearly a year after this all began and while many were fine with forfeiting their constitutional rights temporarily in order to allow governments to “save lives” they have easily become transformed into obedient, unthinking lemmings that keep falling for the next carrot on a stick.

The next carrot on a stick to move this agenda where they want it to go will be a financial incentive to get vaccinated, and they will be sure the people are good and broke before they offer it up.

Former congressman John Delaney has proposed a very clever way to reach this goal to vaccinate 70% of the population: a $1,500 stimulus check for those agreeing to take the untested, rushed into production, liability exempt Covid-19 vaccine.

Of course vaccine stakeholders and fascist dictators alike boast this is a most benevolent strategy designed to save the economy and lives in one clean sweep. Of course those who see beyond the promises and lies know the intent is the exact opposite, perfectly packaged for the believers.

Fool me twice…

Health Impact News:

“Stay of Action” Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using Faulty PCR Tests in Trials

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

An ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION has been filed with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new Pfizer COVID vaccine that has been submitted for “emergency use authorization” (EUA).

It is widely expected that the FDA is going to grant EUA fast-track approval to Pfizer’s experimental COVID vaccine within days.

The STAY OF ACTION is a Petition for Administrative Action Regarding Confirmation of Efficacy End Points of Phase III Clinical Trials of COVID19 Vaccines.

The STAY OF ACTION is based upon the faulty PCR tests that were used in the vaccine trials:

Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee

The Petitioner of this ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION is Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist and founder of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, a CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory in Milford, Connecticut.

Dr. Lee is a world-renowned expert on DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. He has trained and taught in some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.

He recognized very early on that the PCR tests and other tests fast-tracked by the FDA were not accurate in identifying SARSCoV-2 RNA, and even sent a letter, back in March, to Dr. Margaret Harris and Dr. Eduardo Guerrero of the World Health Organization, and Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explaining why the tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA were generating false positives and negatives.

You can read his March 22, 2020 letter here. He explained that a two-phased test would “guarantee no-false positive results” based on his research and published work from Japan.

According to Attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense, he never received a reply from the WHO or the NIH. To this day, they continue to use faulty tests to identify COVID.

So here we are now at the end of November, 2020, and the FDA appears to be ready to grant EUA fast-track approval to COVID vaccines that have gone through Phase I, II, and III vaccine trials, all using these faulty COVID tests.

In Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, he recognizes the great risk for harm on the American public if the vaccine trials are approved based on these faulty tests.

Petitioner and the public will suffer irreparable harm if the actions requested herein are not granted, because once the FDA licenses this COVID-19 vaccine, both governments and employers may make this product mandatory (in general, or for airline or international travel) or may recommend it for widespread use.

If the assignment of cases and non-cases during the course of the trial is not accurate, the vaccine will not have been properly tested. If the vaccine is not properly tested, important public policy decisions regarding its use will be based on misleading evidence. The medical and economic consequences to the nation could hardly be higher.

The New York State Bar Association has already issued a report on COVID-19 recommending that, “a vaccine subject to scientific evidence of safety and efficacy be made widely available, and widely encouraged, and if the public health authorities conclude necessary, required…”

Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that COVID-19 vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, could become mandatory. Without the FDA assuring proper efficacy trials of the vaccine now, the Petitioner and the public may not have the opportunity to object to receiving the vaccine, which was approved based on currently deficient and unreliable clinical trial data.

How likely is it that HHS and the FDA will grant this stay and deal with the PCR testing deficiencies before issuing emergency use fast-track approval to the Pfizer vaccine?

Not very likely at all, unless the public puts pressure on them to be more transparent and deal with these testing deficiencies, that top scientists all around the world now are speaking out against. See:

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

German Lawsuit Against “FactCheckers” Will Force Them To Prove Legitimacy of COVID Tests

Dr. Peter Marks is the head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and will be the main person to make the decision of whether or not to issue an EUA for the Pfizer COVID vaccine. He recently told the press that “Americans can expect a very open process” in their evaluation of the experimental vaccine. (Source.)

We need thousands if not tens of thousands of Americans to contact Dr. Peter Marks and let him know the public is watching, and that we want the FDA to consider Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION and respond to it.

Here is Dr. Marks’ public contact info:

Dr. Peter Marks – email: Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov – Phone: 240-402-8116

Here is FDA Director Dr. Stephen Hahn’s contact info:

Dr. Stephen Hahn – email: Stephen.Hahn@fda.hhs.gov – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

A Strong Warning to the U.S. Military about Operation Warp Speed

Karl-Brandt-Nuremberg-Doctors-Trial

War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg and the “Doctors Trial.” Adolf Hitler’s personal physician, 43-year old Karl Brandt. Brandt was also Reich Commissar for Health and Sanitation, and was indicted by the U.S. prosecution with 22 other Nazi doctors. Brandt was found guilty of participating in and consenting to using concentration camp inmates as guinea pigs in horrible medical experiments, supposedly for the benefit of the armed forces. He was sentenced to death by hanging along with 6 other doctors who received death sentences. Image Source.

If you are a member of the military who will soon be called upon to participate in Operation Warp Speed and help distribute the new experimental COVID vaccine, be careful that you do not end up on the wrong side of history!

Just claiming to be “following orders” if massive deaths and injuries result from this experimental vaccine may not save you!

That is what many of the Nazi doctors in Germany who served under Hitler tried to claim, but during the Nuremberg trials, and specifically the “Doctors Trial” in 1946-1947, twenty of the twenty-three defendants were medical doctors, and were accused of having been involved in Nazi human experimentation and mass murder.

Of the 23 defendants, seven were acquitted and seven received death sentences; the remainder received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment.

What they did under German law, or maybe “emergency orders” during war time, was probably perfectly “legal” at the time, but after the Hitler regime was overthrown those who committed these “legal” actions that resulted in murder and crimes against humanity, were brought to justice after the war.

Dr. Peter Marks and Dr. Stephen Hahn would also do well to just not blindly excuse Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, because Dr. Lee appears to have close ties to Attorney Mary Holland, currently the Counsel for Children’s Health Defense and former Professor of Law at NYU, and one of the nation’s top attorneys when it comes to vaccines.

Mary Holland works now for Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who himself has become one the top attorneys in the world taking on Big Pharma.

He currently has 4 lawsuits filed against pharmaceutical giant Merck, for their approval of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, which has destroyed the lives of so many young people due to being fast-tracked into the market.

The work of Dr. Sin Hang Lee and his DNA sequencing-based diagnostic testing on the HPV Gardasil vaccine found DNA fragments in the vaccine, something that Merck and the FDA had denied. See:

Fighting Academic Censorship on Gardasil Vaccine Research, Dr. Sin Hang Lee Challenges Medical and Scientific Community to Debate in Open Forum

His work in identifying these problems with the Gardasil vaccine led Japan to stop recommending the vaccine as part of their national vaccination program.

Here is a warning from a former Military Commander regarding current Commanders taking part of Operation Warp Speed, and the legal risks of doing so, published at Children’s Health Defense.

Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate

Fast tracking the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable military mandate creates unparalleled dilemma for commanders who will face prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical questions.

By Pam Long
Children’s Health Defense

As the former commanding officer of the Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment of the 36th Medical Evacuation Battalion, I recommend urgent caution for military commanders with orders to have all soldiers vaccinated with the experimental SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

My concerns include the legality of a mandate, lack of treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions, and a research-based risk assessment.

Legal challenges to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandate

Under Emergency Use Authorization, state governments cannot mandate the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the civilian sector. A military mandate would require demonstration that the military sector had a compelling justification for a mandate. Healthy, young service members are not an at-risk group as they are not obese, not over the age of 65 and do not have comorbidities that cause complications from respiratory diseases.

The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine currently is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Even with a pending warp-speed FDA approval in the next month, the military, which still hasn’t rectified the failures, summarized here, of its Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) isn’t in a position to implement a safe SARS-CoV-2 program. The Pfizer and Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, both of which use new mRNA technology, have much more potential for reactogenicity than the anthrax vaccine.

In short, federal courts have set precedent that mandating experimental vaccines in the military is illegal. As I wrote in a previous article:

“In 2008, the federal court affirmed that the FDA, [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] HHS and [Department of Defense] DOD allowed an illegal AVIP program by mandating an experimental anthrax vaccine for military personnel that was not licensed for use against inhalation anthrax, nor approved for use by a presidential waiver.”

The illegal anthrax vaccine mandate caused adverse health outcomes in thousands of service members, triggered a retention crisis among pilots and imposed disciplinary actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice against service members who refused an experimental and highly reactogenic vaccine.

All of these outcomes are likely to reoccur under a SARS-CoV-2 mandate. The HHS distribution plan will allow for millions of people to take the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within a short period of time before any signals of adverse reactions are identified.

A military mandate would also have to demonstrate compelling reason to remove the right of service members to vaccine exemption by confirming with blood titers testing that they have antibody immunity.

Virologists at the La Jolla Institute of Immunology reported to the New York Times in November 2020 regarding coronavirus:

“Eight months after infection, most people who have recovered still have enough immune cells to fend off the virus and prevent illness, the new data show. A slow rate of decline in the short term suggests, happily, that these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time to come.”

The researchers reported that natural immunity can last years.

Policy on treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions

Commanders should reject any plan to mass vaccinate service members with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine without an active surveillance policy in writing to review.

That policy should include a phased roll-out of the vaccine, a screening form for contraindications, vaccine exemptions (for medical contraindication, religious and personal belief accommodations, and those who are immune), education for service members on how to report adverse reactions to the Defense Medical Surveillance System, and training for medical providers on safe vaccine storage along with treatment protocols for adverse reactions.

The lack of established treatment protocols for immune backfiring known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement, when antibodies enhance uptake of the virus instead of neutralizing, should set off alarms for this entire mRNA vaccine program.

Review of the research-based risk assessment

Commanders should demand to see a research-based risk assessment from DOD on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. This risk assessment should be compared to the alternative “no vaccine mandate” course of action for a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.

Some of the hazards previously identified in mRNA animal research include liver damage in ferretsenhanced respiratory disease in mice and ADE lung damage in monkeys. Furthermore, service members of child-producing ages, both male and female, should be informed that developmental and reproductive toxicity has not been established in this vaccine.

Since the U.S. has sidestepped identifying mitigating controls in animal trials for COVID vaccines, then the research implores that all humans should be screened for potential vaccine-induced autoimmunity, and health providers to be prepared for both excessive swelling and pathological clotting.

Safety precautions, as outlined in the study “mRNA Vaccines — a New Era in Vaccinology,” include:

“However, recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA platforms. Potential safety concerns that are likely to be evaluated in future preclinical and clinical studies include local and systemic inflammation, the biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and potential toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.

A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity.

Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.

Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.

Safety will therefore need continued evaluation as different mRNA modalities and delivery systems are utilized for the first time in humans and are tested in larger patient populations.”

Medical ethics require patients’ informed consent in treatment 

Given that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is designed to reduce symptoms and not to prevent infection or transmission, the military lacks a compelling justification for a vaccine mandate for members who are not at risk of virus complications.

This virus does not pose the fatality risks of anthrax or smallpox biological weapons in 2001. There has not been an “imminent risk” established within the military regarding COVID19 over the past six months, during which time  the virus has downgraded in virulence.

In accordance with medical ethics, the chain of command is required to give service members choice in medical treatment with well-established efficacy and demonstrated safety. In 2005, the Journal of Virology reported that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent” treatment for SARs coronavirus, in “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.”

Zinc was also established in 2010 to inhibit coronavirus and block replication of virus cells. Trace element zinc is revered as “Nature’s Gift to Fight Unprecedented Global Pandemic COVID-19” in 2020 research and is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for COVID-19.

In conclusion, the fast tracking of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable mandate in the military will result in an unparalleled dilemma for commanders, with prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical considerations that will clash with the DOD decision makers who have historically favored pharmaceutical vaccine contracts over medical choices of individuals.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Pam Long is graduate of USMA at West Point and is an Army Veteran of the Medical Service Corps. She served as a medical intelligence officer for NATO Stabilization Forces.

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense.

Here are the Contact Details again for the FDA to urge them to address the issues in Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION.

Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research – email: Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov – Phone: 240-402-8116

Dr. Stephen Hahn, Director of the FDA – email: Stephen.Hahn@fda.hhs.gov – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

Tell them America does not want an experimental COVID vaccine until there are accurate tests available to identify SARS-CoV-2! Until then, they need to grant Dr. Lee his “Stay of Action“!

Johns Hopkins Pulls BOMBSHELL Article Because It Destroys The Pandemic Narrative

November 26, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

On November 22, 2020 Johns Hopkins Newsletter published an article by Yanni Gu titled A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19. In this article stat experts declared: “These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Within a few days the powers that be were quick to scrub the article from their website so as to suppress this incredible truth and keep the public believing we are in the midst of a “pandemic.” This is HUGE news that must be shared. Fortunately it can still be found in web archives as follows:

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020  

pasted-image-0

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States. 

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. 

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception? 

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND Graph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND  Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.  

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.

Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general. 

The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.

According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society. 

During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.

“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.

When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.

More Bombshell News You Won’t Find In the Mainstream Media!