Fool Me Once…

No “Normalcy” on The Horizon Even With a Vaccine

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a news conference in the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020.
Chris Kleponis | Bloomberg | Getty Images

December 17, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Covid-19 continues to dominate the headlines and there seems to be no end in sight to the continued media frenzy over “confirmed cases”. What the media fails to report on as usual is the declining death rate and the the fact that total deaths for the year are not far off from the average.

But that’s to be expected, of course, if you are trying to maintain the heightened sense of threat needed to induce a fear driven consent to continued tyranny for the sake of “safety”.

By the summer of 2020 talking heads in governments worldwide were parroting the adage that things cannot go “back normal until we have a vaccine.”

Yet, here we are six months later, and as the Pfizer vaccine is making it’s way into healthcare settings for distribution in the U.S and elsewhere, we have people like Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health associate Amy Hobbs declaring that “wearing a mask will become part of my daily life, moving forward, even after a vaccine is deployed.”

Flip flopping on the story has been the common theme among the experts and now once again we have our favorite expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, Head of The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, going from warning us of the dangers in continued economic and social lockdown back in spring to letting us know (without any real explanation) that any chance of a return to normal is not expected until fall of 2021 at the earliest.

Another one of our favorite Fauci quotes was recorded during a 60 Minutes interview with Dr. Jon LaPook where he avowed that “people should not be walking around in masks”, and while many have assumed that the mask wearing would end once a vaccine hit the scenes, we now have our favorite double speaking health expert declaring:

“Obviously, with a 90-plus percent effective vaccine, you could feel much more confident” about not getting the virus, Fauci told Tapper. “But I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you have been vaccinated.” Those fundamentals include: universal wearing of masks, maintaining physical distance, avoiding large crowds, doing more outdoor activities and washing hands frequently.

Because “even though, for the general population, it might be 90[%] to 95% effective,” said Fauci, “you don’t necessarily know, for you, how effective it is.” Even at those success rates, about 5% to 10% of people immunized may still get the virus.

Sadly, the majority of the unsuspecting public remains completely oblivious of the constant use of promises of TEMPORARY restrictions to elicit consent to a long term agenda. By the time they realize they’ve been fooled it’s already too late.

The methodical deconstruction of the current system is already well under way and most have found a certain comfort in their compliance as they quickly forget that it was supposed to be two weeks to flatten the curve.

It only takes about two months for a certain behavior to become habit, and the ruling class know this. They have spent many decades perfecting the manipulation of human psychology in order to get us to this place.

So, now here we are nearly a year after this all began and while many were fine with forfeiting their constitutional rights temporarily in order to allow governments to “save lives” they have easily become transformed into obedient, unthinking lemmings that keep falling for the next carrot on a stick.

The next carrot on a stick to move this agenda where they want it to go will be a financial incentive to get vaccinated, and they will be sure the people are good and broke before they offer it up.

Former congressman John Delaney has proposed a very clever way to reach this goal to vaccinate 70% of the population: a $1,500 stimulus check for those agreeing to take the untested, rushed into production, liability exempt Covid-19 vaccine.

Of course vaccine stakeholders and fascist dictators alike boast this is a most benevolent strategy designed to save the economy and lives in one clean sweep. Of course those who see beyond the promises and lies know the intent is the exact opposite, perfectly packaged for the believers.

Fool me twice…

Health Impact News:

“Stay of Action” Filed Against FDA to STOP Approval of COVID Vaccine for Using Faulty PCR Tests in Trials

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

An ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION has been filed with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new Pfizer COVID vaccine that has been submitted for “emergency use authorization” (EUA).

It is widely expected that the FDA is going to grant EUA fast-track approval to Pfizer’s experimental COVID vaccine within days.

The STAY OF ACTION is a Petition for Administrative Action Regarding Confirmation of Efficacy End Points of Phase III Clinical Trials of COVID19 Vaccines.

The STAY OF ACTION is based upon the faulty PCR tests that were used in the vaccine trials:

Before an EUA or unrestricted license is issued for the Pfizer vaccine, or for other vaccines for which PCR results are the primary evidence of infection, all “endpoints” or COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by Sanger sequencing, given the high cycle thresholds used in some trials. High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee

The Petitioner of this ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION is Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist and founder of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, a CLIA-certified diagnostic laboratory in Milford, Connecticut.

Dr. Lee is a world-renowned expert on DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. He has trained and taught in some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.

He recognized very early on that the PCR tests and other tests fast-tracked by the FDA were not accurate in identifying SARSCoV-2 RNA, and even sent a letter, back in March, to Dr. Margaret Harris and Dr. Eduardo Guerrero of the World Health Organization, and Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explaining why the tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA were generating false positives and negatives.

You can read his March 22, 2020 letter here. He explained that a two-phased test would “guarantee no-false positive results” based on his research and published work from Japan.

According to Attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense, he never received a reply from the WHO or the NIH. To this day, they continue to use faulty tests to identify COVID.

So here we are now at the end of November, 2020, and the FDA appears to be ready to grant EUA fast-track approval to COVID vaccines that have gone through Phase I, II, and III vaccine trials, all using these faulty COVID tests.

In Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, he recognizes the great risk for harm on the American public if the vaccine trials are approved based on these faulty tests.

Petitioner and the public will suffer irreparable harm if the actions requested herein are not granted, because once the FDA licenses this COVID-19 vaccine, both governments and employers may make this product mandatory (in general, or for airline or international travel) or may recommend it for widespread use.

If the assignment of cases and non-cases during the course of the trial is not accurate, the vaccine will not have been properly tested. If the vaccine is not properly tested, important public policy decisions regarding its use will be based on misleading evidence. The medical and economic consequences to the nation could hardly be higher.

The New York State Bar Association has already issued a report on COVID-19 recommending that, “a vaccine subject to scientific evidence of safety and efficacy be made widely available, and widely encouraged, and if the public health authorities conclude necessary, required…”

Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that COVID-19 vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, could become mandatory. Without the FDA assuring proper efficacy trials of the vaccine now, the Petitioner and the public may not have the opportunity to object to receiving the vaccine, which was approved based on currently deficient and unreliable clinical trial data.

How likely is it that HHS and the FDA will grant this stay and deal with the PCR testing deficiencies before issuing emergency use fast-track approval to the Pfizer vaccine?

Not very likely at all, unless the public puts pressure on them to be more transparent and deal with these testing deficiencies, that top scientists all around the world now are speaking out against. See:

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

German Lawsuit Against “FactCheckers” Will Force Them To Prove Legitimacy of COVID Tests

Dr. Peter Marks is the head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and will be the main person to make the decision of whether or not to issue an EUA for the Pfizer COVID vaccine. He recently told the press that “Americans can expect a very open process” in their evaluation of the experimental vaccine. (Source.)

We need thousands if not tens of thousands of Americans to contact Dr. Peter Marks and let him know the public is watching, and that we want the FDA to consider Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION and respond to it.

Here is Dr. Marks’ public contact info:

Dr. Peter Marks – email: – Phone: 240-402-8116

Here is FDA Director Dr. Stephen Hahn’s contact info:

Dr. Stephen Hahn – email: – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

A Strong Warning to the U.S. Military about Operation Warp Speed


War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg and the “Doctors Trial.” Adolf Hitler’s personal physician, 43-year old Karl Brandt. Brandt was also Reich Commissar for Health and Sanitation, and was indicted by the U.S. prosecution with 22 other Nazi doctors. Brandt was found guilty of participating in and consenting to using concentration camp inmates as guinea pigs in horrible medical experiments, supposedly for the benefit of the armed forces. He was sentenced to death by hanging along with 6 other doctors who received death sentences. Image Source.

If you are a member of the military who will soon be called upon to participate in Operation Warp Speed and help distribute the new experimental COVID vaccine, be careful that you do not end up on the wrong side of history!

Just claiming to be “following orders” if massive deaths and injuries result from this experimental vaccine may not save you!

That is what many of the Nazi doctors in Germany who served under Hitler tried to claim, but during the Nuremberg trials, and specifically the “Doctors Trial” in 1946-1947, twenty of the twenty-three defendants were medical doctors, and were accused of having been involved in Nazi human experimentation and mass murder.

Of the 23 defendants, seven were acquitted and seven received death sentences; the remainder received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment.

What they did under German law, or maybe “emergency orders” during war time, was probably perfectly “legal” at the time, but after the Hitler regime was overthrown those who committed these “legal” actions that resulted in murder and crimes against humanity, were brought to justice after the war.

Dr. Peter Marks and Dr. Stephen Hahn would also do well to just not blindly excuse Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION, because Dr. Lee appears to have close ties to Attorney Mary Holland, currently the Counsel for Children’s Health Defense and former Professor of Law at NYU, and one of the nation’s top attorneys when it comes to vaccines.

Mary Holland works now for Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who himself has become one the top attorneys in the world taking on Big Pharma.

He currently has 4 lawsuits filed against pharmaceutical giant Merck, for their approval of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, which has destroyed the lives of so many young people due to being fast-tracked into the market.

The work of Dr. Sin Hang Lee and his DNA sequencing-based diagnostic testing on the HPV Gardasil vaccine found DNA fragments in the vaccine, something that Merck and the FDA had denied. See:

Fighting Academic Censorship on Gardasil Vaccine Research, Dr. Sin Hang Lee Challenges Medical and Scientific Community to Debate in Open Forum

His work in identifying these problems with the Gardasil vaccine led Japan to stop recommending the vaccine as part of their national vaccination program.

Here is a warning from a former Military Commander regarding current Commanders taking part of Operation Warp Speed, and the legal risks of doing so, published at Children’s Health Defense.

Former Officer Warns Military of Pitfalls Surrounding COVID Vaccine Mandate

Fast tracking the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable military mandate creates unparalleled dilemma for commanders who will face prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical questions.

By Pam Long
Children’s Health Defense

As the former commanding officer of the Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment of the 36th Medical Evacuation Battalion, I recommend urgent caution for military commanders with orders to have all soldiers vaccinated with the experimental SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

My concerns include the legality of a mandate, lack of treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions, and a research-based risk assessment.

Legal challenges to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandate

Under Emergency Use Authorization, state governments cannot mandate the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the civilian sector. A military mandate would require demonstration that the military sector had a compelling justification for a mandate. Healthy, young service members are not an at-risk group as they are not obese, not over the age of 65 and do not have comorbidities that cause complications from respiratory diseases.

The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine currently is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Even with a pending warp-speed FDA approval in the next month, the military, which still hasn’t rectified the failures, summarized here, of its Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) isn’t in a position to implement a safe SARS-CoV-2 program. The Pfizer and Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, both of which use new mRNA technology, have much more potential for reactogenicity than the anthrax vaccine.

In short, federal courts have set precedent that mandating experimental vaccines in the military is illegal. As I wrote in a previous article:

“In 2008, the federal court affirmed that the FDA, [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] HHS and [Department of Defense] DOD allowed an illegal AVIP program by mandating an experimental anthrax vaccine for military personnel that was not licensed for use against inhalation anthrax, nor approved for use by a presidential waiver.”

The illegal anthrax vaccine mandate caused adverse health outcomes in thousands of service members, triggered a retention crisis among pilots and imposed disciplinary actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice against service members who refused an experimental and highly reactogenic vaccine.

All of these outcomes are likely to reoccur under a SARS-CoV-2 mandate. The HHS distribution plan will allow for millions of people to take the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within a short period of time before any signals of adverse reactions are identified.

A military mandate would also have to demonstrate compelling reason to remove the right of service members to vaccine exemption by confirming with blood titers testing that they have antibody immunity.

Virologists at the La Jolla Institute of Immunology reported to the New York Times in November 2020 regarding coronavirus:

“Eight months after infection, most people who have recovered still have enough immune cells to fend off the virus and prevent illness, the new data show. A slow rate of decline in the short term suggests, happily, that these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time to come.”

The researchers reported that natural immunity can last years.

Policy on treatment protocols and surveillance for adverse reactions

Commanders should reject any plan to mass vaccinate service members with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine without an active surveillance policy in writing to review.

That policy should include a phased roll-out of the vaccine, a screening form for contraindications, vaccine exemptions (for medical contraindication, religious and personal belief accommodations, and those who are immune), education for service members on how to report adverse reactions to the Defense Medical Surveillance System, and training for medical providers on safe vaccine storage along with treatment protocols for adverse reactions.

The lack of established treatment protocols for immune backfiring known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement, when antibodies enhance uptake of the virus instead of neutralizing, should set off alarms for this entire mRNA vaccine program.

Review of the research-based risk assessment

Commanders should demand to see a research-based risk assessment from DOD on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. This risk assessment should be compared to the alternative “no vaccine mandate” course of action for a virus with a 99.9% survival rate.

Some of the hazards previously identified in mRNA animal research include liver damage in ferretsenhanced respiratory disease in mice and ADE lung damage in monkeys. Furthermore, service members of child-producing ages, both male and female, should be informed that developmental and reproductive toxicity has not been established in this vaccine.

Since the U.S. has sidestepped identifying mitigating controls in animal trials for COVID vaccines, then the research implores that all humans should be screened for potential vaccine-induced autoimmunity, and health providers to be prepared for both excessive swelling and pathological clotting.

Safety precautions, as outlined in the study “mRNA Vaccines — a New Era in Vaccinology,” include:

“However, recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA platforms. Potential safety concerns that are likely to be evaluated in future preclinical and clinical studies include local and systemic inflammation, the biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and potential toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.

A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity.

Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.

Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.

Safety will therefore need continued evaluation as different mRNA modalities and delivery systems are utilized for the first time in humans and are tested in larger patient populations.”

Medical ethics require patients’ informed consent in treatment 

Given that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is designed to reduce symptoms and not to prevent infection or transmission, the military lacks a compelling justification for a vaccine mandate for members who are not at risk of virus complications.

This virus does not pose the fatality risks of anthrax or smallpox biological weapons in 2001. There has not been an “imminent risk” established within the military regarding COVID19 over the past six months, during which time  the virus has downgraded in virulence.

In accordance with medical ethics, the chain of command is required to give service members choice in medical treatment with well-established efficacy and demonstrated safety. In 2005, the Journal of Virology reported that hydroxychloroquine was a “potent” treatment for SARs coronavirus, in “Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.”

Zinc was also established in 2010 to inhibit coronavirus and block replication of virus cells. Trace element zinc is revered as “Nature’s Gift to Fight Unprecedented Global Pandemic COVID-19” in 2020 research and is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for COVID-19.

In conclusion, the fast tracking of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for a probable mandate in the military will result in an unparalleled dilemma for commanders, with prodigious legal, medical, safety and ethical considerations that will clash with the DOD decision makers who have historically favored pharmaceutical vaccine contracts over medical choices of individuals.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Pam Long is graduate of USMA at West Point and is an Army Veteran of the Medical Service Corps. She served as a medical intelligence officer for NATO Stabilization Forces.

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense.

Here are the Contact Details again for the FDA to urge them to address the issues in Dr. Lee’s ADMINISTRATIVE STAY OF ACTION.

Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research – email: – Phone: 240-402-8116

Dr. Stephen Hahn, Director of the FDA – email: – Phone (Main FDA #): 1-888-463-6332 – Twitter account: @SteveFDA

Tell them America does not want an experimental COVID vaccine until there are accurate tests available to identify SARS-CoV-2! Until then, they need to grant Dr. Lee his “Stay of Action“!

Johns Hopkins Pulls BOMBSHELL Article Because It Destroys The Pandemic Narrative

November 26, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

On November 22, 2020 Johns Hopkins Newsletter published an article by Yanni Gu titled A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19. In this article stat experts declared: “These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Within a few days the powers that be were quick to scrub the article from their website so as to suppress this incredible truth and keep the public believing we are in the midst of a “pandemic.” This is HUGE news that must be shared. Fortunately it can still be found in web archives as follows:

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

By YANNI GU | November 22, 2020  



After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States. 

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. 

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception? 

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND Graph depicts the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND  Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.  

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

Briand also mentioned that more research and data are needed to truly decipher the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States.

Throughout the talk, Briand constantly emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general. 

The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic, Briand explained. Each life is equally important and we should be reminded that even during a global pandemic we should not forget about the tragic loss of lives from other causes.

According to Briand, the over-exaggeration of the COVID-19 death number may be due to the constant emphasis on COVID-19-related deaths and the habitual overlooking of deaths by other natural causes in society. 

During an interview with The News-Letter after the event, Poorna Dharmasena, a master’s candidate in Applied Economics, expressed his opinion about Briand’s concluding remarks.

“At the end of the day, it’s still a deadly virus. And over-exaggeration or not, to a certain degree, is irrelevant,” Dharmasena said.

When asked whether the public should be informed about this exaggeration in death numbers, Dharmasena stated that people have a right to know the truth. However, COVID-19 should still continuously be treated as a deadly disease to safeguard the vulnerable population.

More Bombshell News You Won’t Find In the Mainstream Media!

Breaking News: PCR Test Found Unreliable


Portuguese Court of Appeal considers PCR tests unreliable and lifts quarantine

Here the judgment can be found. Due to lack of language skills, reference is made to the presentation and interpretation of the judgment on , where the tenor is quoted as follows:
acórdão citius.pdf

Portugiesisches Berufungsgericht hält PCR-Tests für unzuverlässig und he…An den PCR Tests, die auf eine Veröffentlichung des deutschen Virologen Christian Drosten zurückzuführen und vom…

 ” Based on the currently available scientific evidence, this test is [the RT-PCR test] in and of itself is not able to unambiguously determine whether the positivity actually corresponds to an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, for several reasons, two of which are paramount: the reliability of the test depends on the number of cycles used; the reliability of the test depends on the viral load present.

With reference to Jaafar et al. (2020; the court concludes that “if a person tests positive by PCR, if a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as described in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the likelihood that this person is infected is <3% and the likelihood that the result will be a false positive is 97% “. The court also notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being carried out in Portugal is unknown.

With reference to Surkova et al. (2020;–7/fulltext ) the court further states that every diagnostic test must be interpreted in the context of the actual probability of illness, as assessed prior to performing the test itself, and expresses the opinion that “In the current epidemiological landscape, the likelihood of Covid-19 tests giving false positive results is increasing, with significant implications for individuals, the health system and society Has”.

The court’s summary for ruling against the regional health authority’s appeal reads as follows:

“Given the scientific doubts expressed by experts, ie, those who play a role, about the reliability of the PCR tests, the lack of information on the analytical parameters of the tests and the lack of a medical diagnosis as to the presence of an infection or an infection risk occupied, this test can never tell if C actually was a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or whether A, B and D were at high risk. ” “

Update : A reader contributed this translation , thank you!

Update: And someone found these sources:–7t8pdl-l1‑3/

It’s all falling apart. One by one the dominoes will fall and at the end will be freedom for humanity. Never lose hope.

Costco Announces They Intend To Violate Federal Law And Are Happy To Discriminate

November 14, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

“Effective Nov. 16, 2020, we will require all members, guests and employees to wear a face mask or face shield at Costco locations,” Costco’s president and chief executive officer, Craig Jelinek, wrote in a statement yesterday.

A mask requirement has been in place at all Costco stores since May 4. However, those with a medical condition were previously exempt from the rule.

“This [exemption] is no longer the case. If a member has a medical condition that prevents them from wearing a mask, they must wear a face shield at Costco,” Jelinek said.

Apparently Mr. Jelinek doesn’t seem to realize that some of these medical exemptions are for psychological issues that prevent the placement of any type of restrictive device being forced on or around their face.

And apparently he also seems to think he has the authority to violate Federal Laws which protect those with disabilities from being discriminated against, while also ignoring the rules laid out by the Governor. I know in my state our Governor has declared that those with a medical condition are exempt from wearing a face covering. It doesn’t say “unless that face covering is a plastic shield.”

The truth of it is this: medical exemption or not – you do NOT have to wear a face diaper to shop at Costco, or anywhere for that matter!

When you enter into a grocery store or any business and someone asks you where your face mask is ask them why they expect you to wear one. Here are the possible replies and the coinciding answer you should give:

“To prevent the spread of Covid-19 and keep our other customers safe.” To which you respond…

“Can I see the physicians affidavit to confirm that I am in fact a threat to public safety? Unless there is a medical assessment done by a medical professional that has been sworn by affidavit to affirm that I am carrying a communicable disease, and that affidavit has been given to a Health Official who then obtains a court order for me to be isolated, I am not a direct threat.”

“You have to wear one because it’s our store policy.” To which you reply…

“Your store policy cannot override my federally protected rights. You cannot enforce a store policy that is against the LAW.”

“It’s the law.” To which you reply…

“No, actually it’s not the LAW. The LAW is the Constitution, which protects my right to speak freely and obtain LIFE-giving oxygen without obstruction. The LAW is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlaws discrimination and allows for equal access to goods and services. There is no LAW which declares I must conceal my identity in order to shop. Can you show me the statute?”

“It’s for your health and safety and the safety of others.” To which you reply…

“Can I see your license to practice medicine? Are you a doctor? Are you my doctor? My doctor has advised against me wearing a mask or anything on my face. Did you know it is against the law to practice medicine without a license?”

When they are unable to answer your questions you then proceed to go about your shopping. If they try to block you from entering, advise them that they are committing a crime known as false imprisonment.

Just the act of harassment alone, even if only verbal, is considered assault. If they lay a finger on you it then becomes battery. Be sure to document the entire experience.

If they refuse to let you pass after advising them of the laws they are breaking you may choose to leave before the police are called but be sure to record the names of those involved and the time of the incident, as well as the details, for later reference.

Now you have a CAUSE OF ACTION for a Civil Complaint. You can then ask a court for an injunction to prevent Costco (or any other store) from violating your rights again or causing you continued harm by drafting and filing a “Complaint for Declaratory and Emergency Injunctive Relief”.

Even if you do NOT engage in any of this dialogue YOU STILL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION! The moment they refuse you entry even though you are a paying member they have committed the crime of harassment. You can turn around and leave right there and still follow through with the next steps. Be sure to watch the video below!

The only way that we are going to win this fight is if the people get BRAVE, GET EDUCATED and STAND UP! You don’t need a lawyer! You just need motivation. Our future is at stake. It is time to make our legal system work for us! It is time to take back our FREEDOM.

My latest rant on BitChute:

How The CDC Has Created The Illusion of Excess Deaths From Covid-19

November 9, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

It has been eight months since Covid-19 began it’s reign of terror in America, quickly becoming a household name. In order for governments to continue their “mitigation” tactics, relentlessly subverting the will of the people and depriving them of their Constitutional rights, there must be a continued state of emergency in order to justify these draconian policies.

The single most important deciding factor in calling for a continued state of emergency is the PERCEPTION that one exists. How exactly does one determine this state of emergency when hospitals remain operating at normal capacity and evidence of widespread death remains unseen?

By manipulating statistical data to create the illusion of excess death.

Misreporting In The Last Three Years Has Lead to Questionable Estimates

If you look at the data from The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for death totals from 1999-2018 you can see that The CDC reports the total deaths increased in large amounts from 2009 to 2016 and then suddenly stopped increasing in 2018 and 2019.

Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2018 Results

Data for 2019 is obtainable here (click “Downloads” then “Download data”; the total deaths for 2019 was determined by adding column “K” from rows 119 to 170 which are data for weeks 1-52 of 2019).

That gives you a total of 2,845,796 for 2019.

As you can see 2017, 2018 and 2019 totals are nearly identical which makes no sense considering from 2010 to 2016, the number of deaths increased by 275,813. Given the data on hand one should estimate deaths in the U.S. to increase by 275,000 every six years or so. But suddenly come 2018 that increase completely halts.

Using this incredibly questionable data we arrive at an expected death count for the year 2020 that is actually lower than that for 2019. The CDC has taken the death count from 2017, 2018 and 2019 and added them up to get an average of 2,832,835.

Anything over this number can now be attributed to Covid-19.

According to the data from the CDC found above from 1999 to 2010 the number of deaths per year stayed relatively constant from approximately 2,390,000 to 2,470,000 deaths per year while the total U.S. population increased by about 30 million people.

Since 2010, though, deaths per year have reportedly increased by about 400,000 per year compared to 2009, while up to 2018 the CDC estimated the population only increased by 20 million people. This presents a serious question: is there a huge increase in death in those years or a discrepancy in data collection for total population?

Census takers say they were told to enter false information

In a Fox News article released on November 8, 2020 two census takers told The Associated Press that their supervisors pressured them to enter false information into a computer system about homes they had not visited so they could close cases ahead of their deadline.

Census workers, Pam Roberts of Indiana and Maria Arce of Massachusetts, both blew the whistle on their supervisors and exposed that they were instructed to make up answers about households where no one was home.

The Fox News article reads:

“The census takers shared their experiences with the AP as a coalition of local governments and advocacy groups wages a battle in federal court over the accuracy of the 2020 census. A lawsuit filed in California challenged the decision by the Commerce Department, which oversees the Census Bureau, to speed up deadlines so that the count would end in September.

The coalition argued that the shortened timeline would cause minority communities to be undercounted in the data used to determine the number of congressional seats in each state.

A judge ruled that the count could continue through the end of October and that census officials could continue crunching the numbers through April 2021. But the Trump administration appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sided with the administration and allowed census field operations to end in mid-October. An appellate court suspended the judge’s order on the deadline for the numbers to be used for congressional representation. That issue is still being litigated.”

My theory in all of this is a deliberate skewing of the numbers not only for political purposes but for even more falsified data to be used as we embark on a new year of pandemic hell with the coming Covid-21.

We all know that the CDC has been colluding with The World Health Organization, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank and World Economic Forum to maintain a stranglehold on the world population long enough to roll out the Great Reset, the Digital Dollar and the nanotechnology laced Covid Vaccine for a new world order dystopian surveillance state that the masses will call the “New Normal.”

It’s clear to see how easy it is to maintain control over the perception of the masses when you can control how data is collected and used.

Check out my video on this…

Thanks for subscribing!

Dr. Fauci’s Own Words Destroy The COVID-19 Narrative

November 7, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

Listen to the EXPERTS!

Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), has been touted as one of the leading experts concerning the coronavirus pandemic, and has stood at the forefront of Covid-19 policy in America, yet this very same expert is also the same guy who has directly contradicted his own stance on more than one occasion.

Experts have known Covid-19 is not a pandemic since February, 2020

While lay people, politicians, and judges have been left helpless and at the mercy of health experts claiming “we just don’t know enough” during the first lockdown phase of Covid-19 disease, we are too far along now and have learned more than enough about the Covid-19 disease to allow the same set of health experts to hoodwink us into a second round of unjustified  rights violations. 

Based on preliminary data out of China, as early as February, 2020, public health officials Anthony Fauci and Robert Redfield, heads of the NIAID and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), respectively, and current members of the Presidential Task Force on Coronavirus, acknowledged that Covid-19 was probably not as deadly of a virus as first thought and may end up being close to the seasonal flu in number of deaths and number of people infected (scientists use these two numbers — number of deaths and number of people infected — to calculate something called the “mortality rate” or “case fatality rate” of a virus, which is the single most important number in determining whether a virus qualifies as a public health emergency). 

On February 28, 2020, Fauci and Redfield wrote in an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine:  

“The case fatality rate (of Covid-19) may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

Neither Fauci nor Redfield have retracted nor modified this prediction about Covid-19 in any official manner since February, 2020, and most scientific data since the publication of this article have verified that Covid-19 is akin to the seasonal flu in mortality rate. 

There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020.

In an interview with Dr. Jon LaPook on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Dr. Fauci claimed that people should not be wearing a mask unless you are infected, yet later on he was quoted as saying that “everyone” must wear a mask to slow the spread of coronavirus and that state and local leaders should be “as forceful as possible” to get the public to wear masks.

So, which is it Mr. Expert? Seems like that depends on what direction the agenda is heading.

Bombshell: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw

In a July 16, 2020 podcast called “This Week in Virology” Dr. Anthony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID-19 test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Starting at about the 4-minute mark Dr. Fauci says:

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule… you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

What Fauci failed to say in the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles and not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud.

Page 35

When your country’s leading health expert can’t even keep his story straight it’s safe to say that it’s probably time to start looking elsewhere for answers. Let’s not forget that Anthony Fauci also has a vested interest in the coming vaccine campaign and holds a position on the Global Vaccine Action Plan developed by none other than Bill and Melinda Gates. Read my previous article Covid-19 Is The Litmus Test to learn more about the truth about Covid-19 and those behind the deception.

The Flu Suddenly Vanishes in 2020

November 4, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

While ‘confirmed cases’ of Covid-19 continue to rise, an interesting bit of data has surfaced in regards to the seasonal flu. Apparently the flu no longer exists as long as Covid-19 is ruling the testing scene. While some are saying this is the result of universal masking and social distancing measures, there is no actual proof of that and instead this notion is based merely on correlation. If the masking and social distancing actually worked to prevent the spread of any influenza like illness (ILI) wouldn’t it also have stopped the spread of Covid-19 as well?

The reason why we continue to see an increase in Covid-19 while the flu has all but vanished is simple: the flu is no longer being tested for because health care providers are automatically going to look for Covid-19 instead. And of course they are going to find it. If they had tested for the flu they would have found that instead. It’s all about the PCR test and it’s inability to decipher a true positive for any virus it is intended to detect.

Add to that the fact that Covid-19 diagnoses are being made in many cases based on symptoms alone and it’s not at all surprising.

‘Surveillance’ data collected by the World Health Organization (WHO) shows that as Covid-19 came on the scene towards the end of March the number of reported flu cases all but disappeared.

In Australia, just 14 positive flu cases were recorded in April, compared with 367 during the same month in 2019 – a 96 per cent drop. By June, usually the peak of its flu season, there were none. In fact, Australia has not reported a positive case to the WHO since July.

In Chile, just 12 cases of flu were detected between April and October. There were nearly 7,000 during the same period in 2019. 

In the UK, since Covid-19 began spreading in March, just 767 cases have been reported to the WHO compared with nearly 7,000 from March to October last year. 

And in South Africa, surveillance tests picked up just two cases at the beginning of the season, which quickly dropped to zero over the following month – overall, a 99 per cent drop compared with the previous year.

While some hold on to the theory that this is the result of what’s known as ‘viral interference’ where one virus ‘crowds out’ another preventing infection, most of the so called experts are choosing instead to claim that the only reasonable explanation is that the masking and social distancing, as well as school and business closures, actually work. This deduction however is not based on any significant statistical data and instead is based on a need to make sense of the situation without admitting that the method of diagnosis for Covid-19 is fundamentally flawed and thatb this entire fiasco is a fraud.

Concerning the use of PCR testing, the Centers for Disease Control(CDC) has revealed that, “Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.” This means a positive test doesn’t guarantee that the Covid-19 virus is causing infection at all and the virus might not be in the patient’s body whatsoever. The WHO has also told us that, “Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”

The PCR is testing for a specific RNA sequence not the full viral genome, so even if it accurately detects that RNA sequence, there is no proof that RNA sequence is from SARS-CoV-2, as it could be from another virus, microorganism or even part of your own human gene sequence. Since the PCR test is only able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times to then manufacture what it is looking for the test should not be used for diagnosis. The inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, specifically pointed this out and this is also why he has called the test an ‘oxymoron’ in relation to it’s use as a quantitative test. It cannot distinguish between a live virus and dead particles.

Because of these facts you can have someone who has the flu, be tested for Covid-19 and wind up with a positive test. Take into account the fact that CDC guidance for diagnosis also calls for a Covid-19 label based on mere suspicion alone, without the need for laboratory testing, and it becomes quite clear that what we have here is a mislabeling of illness.

Biden as President in a Script for a Global Economic Fix by 2023

October 24, 2020 ~ By Levana Lomma

An article written by Time Magazine on October 22, 2020, found under a whole web page dedicated to the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, is titled: It’s 2023. Here’s How We Fixed the Global Economy. This article is basically a script for the next 3 years, outlining the desired outcome of the fake worldwide pandemic the elites used to crash economies and leave the people more easily manipulated. It is predictive programming at it’s finest.

Illustration by Neil Jamieson for TIME

The year is 2023. The COVID-19 pandemic has come to an end, and the global economy is on the path to recovery. How did we get here? How did our economy and society evolve to overcome the greatest crisis of our age?

The author goes on to write about the economic fall out from Covid-19 and how this ultimately made it clear that new policies were needed to address climate risks, incentivize green lending, scale up financial institutions tackling social and environmental goals, and ban financial-sector activity that didn’t serve a clear public purpose.

Which makes no sense.

In other words, Covid-19 has proven to be the perfect smokescreen to push the world economy into one that is restructured around regulations that align with the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals while simultaneously destroying capitalism and the free market and solidifying socialism.

The U.S. began to change its approach after Nov. 3, 2020, when Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in the presidential election and the Democrats held the majority in both houses of Congress. Following his Inauguration in January 2021, President Biden moved quickly to rebuild frayed ties between America and Europe, setting up a forum to share collective intelligence that could inform a smarter form of government.

This article paints a picture of an election won by Joe Biden and it becomes quite obvious that those behind this agenda need to keep Democrats in office if they expect to pull this off. Biden is obviously the more preferable puppet for the job and will be sure to keep the fear factor alive with mandatory masking and continued government tyranny for all indefinitely. The illusion of a pandemic must remain in place for at least another year or so to ensure the “recovery efforts” allow for the Great Reset to come to fruition.

On Feb. 11, 2021, the FDA approved the most promising COVID-19 vaccine for manufacture in the U.S. Mass production began immediately, plans for swift global distribution kicked in, and the first citizens received their shots within three weeks, free at the point of use. 

This is the timeline they are hoping for! A vaccine for all in record time, free at the point of use and guaranteed for even the poorest countries, because according to Bill Gates, if we do a really good job on vaccinations we can reduce the world population by up to 15%. What better way to kill two birds with one stone for massive profit?

In the summer of 2022, the other major crisis of our age took a turn for the apocalyptic. Climate breakdown finally landed in the developed world, testing the resilience of social systems. In the Midwestern U.S., a severe drought wiped out crops that supplied one-sixth of the world’s grain output. People woke up to the need for governments to form a coordinated response to climate change and direct global fiscal stimulus in support of a green economy.

And here’s where the story really gets juicy. By the year 2022 we can expect there to be major droughts and other so called “natural” disasters. These will of course be achieved through the use of radio frequency technology that can manipulate the weather, combined with the use of directed energy weapons.

Mark my words: in the next two years there will be catastrophic hurricanes, fires, and serious drought in order to command submission to the climate change agenda and force migration of the people into their coming smart cities.

And CEOs had to certify that their companies were complying with the rules—or face criminal penalties for violating them.

The people will have no choice but to wake up to the need for governments to form a coordinated response and the acceptance of a fiscal stimulus in support of a green economy. Businesses will comply with all regulations or they will not get their bailouts and may even face criminal prosecution.

And so we stand here in 2023 the same people but in a different society. COVID-19 convinced us we could not go back to business as usual. The world has embraced a “new normal” that ensures public-private collaborations are driven by public interest, not private profit.

Welcome to your new world order, a communist utopia with tyranny and vaccines for all, brought to you by COVID-19, the pandemic that never was.

Watch my video on this article below: